Skip to main content
· 11/27/1989

Wischmeyer v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

Citations

  • 725 F. Supp. 995
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14136
  • 1989 WL 142108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court will apply \plain and ordinary meaning\ of clause where language required by statute
  • holding that court will apply “plain and ordinary meaning” of clause where language required by statute
  • holding that under Indiana law, if insured's pre-existing disability results in claim arising after contestability period expires, insurer may not defend on basis of pre-existing disability
  • holding that under Indiana law, if insured’s pre-existing disability results in claim arising after contestability period expires, insurer may not defend on basis of pre-existing disability
  • \This ____ clause of the contract is plain and unambiguous.\
  • discussing history and rationale behind clauses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKINNEY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.