Wirzburger v. Galvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a Free Exercise challenge to 8 provisions of the Massachusetts Constitution prohibiting voter initiatives to amend the state 9 constitution to allow public financial support of private, religiously affiliated schools
• “Government actions that are aimed at some goal other than restricting the conveyance of ideas are generally permissible, even if they incidentally inhibit free speech.”
• “Because we [hold] that the [challenged law] does not violate the Free Exercise Clause, we apply rational basis scrutiny to the fundamental rights based claim that [the law] violates equal protection.”
• “Because we [hold] that the [challenged law] does not violate the Free Exercise Clause, we apply rational basis scrutiny to the fundamental rights based claim that [the law] violates equal protection.”
• applying intermediate scrutiny to gatekeeper provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).