Skip to main content
· 5/4/1993

Wirth v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

Citations

  • 613 N.E.2d 874
  • 1993 Ind. Tax LEXIS 28
  • 1993 WL 137773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that while an expert’s compensation may affect the credibility of his testimony, it does not affect the admissibility of his testimony
  • stating that property “[v]aluation questions call for subjective judgment”
  • stating that “[v]aluation questions call for subjective judgment”
  • discussing exceptions to the general rule
  • discussing exceptions to the general rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.