Wirth Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the \`absence of a reference to a particular product in the Petition does not necessarily indicate that the product is not subject to an order'\
• stating that the “ ‘absence of a reference to a particular product in the Petition does not necessarily indicate that the product is not subject to an order’ ”
• noting that “[the] absence of a reference to a particular product in the Petition does not necessarily indicate that the product is not subject to an order”
• sustaining Commerce’s conclusion that purchasers of profile slab have similar expectations to purchasers of carbon steel plate
• rejecting argument that the regulations required a dispositive listing of all HTSUS numbers and concluding that the HTSUS list alone did not constitute the entirety of products covered by the petition or the order that followed
• rejecting argument that the regulations required a dispositive listing of all HTSUS numbers and concluding that the HTSUS list alone did not constitute the entirety of products covered by the petition or the order that followed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).