Skip to main content
· 4/2/2015

Wiredu v. State

Citations

  • 222 Md. App. 212
  • 112 A.3d 1014
  • 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that lost wages of those other than the immediate victim are not compensable via restitution
  • interpreting restitution statute similar to Vermont's and declining to allow restitution for victim's wife's lost wages after she quit her job to care for her injured husband because the statute did not allow courts to \award restitution for the lost earnings of others\
  • “The decision to order restitution pursuant to [§ 11-603] and the amount lie within the trial court’s sound discretion and we review the trial court’s decision on the abuse of discretion standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Nazarian, Leahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.