Wipfli v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that, when a [circuit] court keeps within the limitations imposed by the statute as to allowing amendments, the power is very broad, resting in sound discretion, and the decision will not be disturbed expect for a clear abuse of judicial power.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stanhope v. Brown County
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-06-29· cited 132×
• MacH v. Allison
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-12-05· cited 51×
• Soczka v. Rechner
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 33×
• Wiegel v. Sentry Indemnity Co.
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-02-07· cited 20×
• Tri-State Home Improvement Co. v. Mansavage
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-05-17· cited 15×
• Theuerkauf v. Schnellbaecher
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1974-06-04· cited 10×
• Drehmel v. Radandt
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 8×
• College Avenue BP, Inc. v. Arorora Investments
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2026-02-10