Winterscheidt v. Winterscheidt

Citations

• 110 Kan. 649
• 205 P. 600
• 1922 Kan. LEXIS 114

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Garnishment — Immature and Contingent Liabilities Subject to Garnishment. Under the statute relating to garnishment, and following Bank v. Dandelinger, 103 Kan. 444, 175 Pac. 109, it is held that the unmatured and contingent liabilities involved herein were properly reached by the garnishment.</p> <p>2. Same — Bernice oj Summons — Appearance Waives Dejects in Service. The appearance and answer of Emma Weber, the defendant in the Roberts case, precluded her from subsequently questioning the service of the garnishment summons.</p> <p>3. Same — Orders in Garnishment Proceedings Properly Made. The orders appealed from held to have been properly made and with sufficient jurisdiction.</p>