Winter v. FloorPro, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a subcontractor not in contractual privity with the United States was not a “contractor” within the meaning of the CDA
• ASBCA’s jurisdiction is governed by the CDA, which is a waiver of sovereign immunity and must be strictly construed
• “[T]he provisions of the CDA apply only to ‘contractors,’ i.e., ‘part[ies] to a Government contract other than the Government.’ ”
• “[T]he provisions of the CDA apply only to ‘contrac- tors,’ i.e., ‘part[ies] to a Government contract other than the Government.’”
• “[S]ubcontractors are generally not in privity of contract with the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).