Winston v. Pizza Hut
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 859
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in granting appellee's motion for summary judgment. There was no genuine issue of material fact that the rainwater just inside the door of the Pizza Hut in which appellant slipped and fell constituted an open and obvious danger. As a result, appellee did not owe a duty of care to appellant, and no liability in negligence is possible as a matter of law. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting deduction from taxable income royalty payments made to a passive investment company
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.