Skip to main content
· 9/25/1991

Federal Case

Citations

  • 944 F.2d 1351
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Act did not apply where a painter was injured while painting advertisement on a railroad bridge because the advertising agreement at issue did not involve construction
  • “In order to be timely, a rule 59(e) motion must be filed ‘not later than 10 days after entry of the judgment’ it seeks to alter or amend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.