Winston Network, Inc. v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that estoppel can apply if 16 after making “an examination of the record . . . the issue for which preclusion is sought is the 17 only rational one the factfinder could have found, then that issue is considered foreclosed”
• burden on party asserting preclusion to show with clarity and certainty what was actually decided
• arbitration decision does not preclude federal lawsuit where arbitration panel had no jurisdiction over federal claims
• “The party 12 asserting preclusion bears the burden of showing with clarity and certainty what 13 was determined by the prior judgment.”
• “The party asserting preclusion bears the burden of showing with clarity and certainty what was determined by the prior judgment.”
• “The party asserting preclusion bears the burden of showing with clarity and certainty what was determined by the prior judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).