· 2/2/2012
Winston Holloway v. Benny Magness
Citations
- 666 F.3d 1076
- 2012 WL 301037
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Just as [prison officials] had no First Amendment obligation to provide any telephone service, [they] had no obligation to provide that service at a particular cost to users.”
- “The Constitution does not prohibit charging prisoners for essential prison services, at least in the absence of a showing that the result is a severe deprivation of a fundamental right.”
- “The Constitution does not prohibit charging prisoners for essential prison services, at least in the absence of a showing that the result is a severe deprivation of a fundamental right.”
- “The Constitution does not prohibit charging prisoners for essential prison services, at least in the absence of a showing that the result is a severe deprivation of a fundamental right”
- upholding dismissal of inmate's challenge of prison telephone rates
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Beam, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.