Skip to main content
· 2/2/2012

Winston Holloway v. Benny Magness

Citations

  • 666 F.3d 1076
  • 2012 WL 301037
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Just as [prison officials] had no First Amendment obligation to provide any telephone service, [they] had no obligation to provide that service at a particular cost to users.”
  • “The Constitution does not prohibit charging prisoners for essential prison services, at least in the absence of a showing that the result is a severe deprivation of a fundamental right.”
  • “The Constitution does not prohibit charging prisoners for essential prison services, at least in the absence of a showing that the result is a severe deprivation of a fundamental right.”
  • “The Constitution does not prohibit charging prisoners for essential prison services, at least in the absence of a showing that the result is a severe deprivation of a fundamental right”
  • upholding dismissal of inmate's challenge of prison telephone rates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Beam, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.