WINSTON DENNARD PINTO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that proof of an Eighth Amendment violation differs based on the type of violation alleged
• “[Our previous] holding that ‘severe or repetitive sexual abuse of a prisoner by a prison official can violate the Eighth Amendment,’ remains good law.”
• “[A] lack of serious injury, while not dispositive, is relevant to the inquiry.”
• allegations may not be disregarded where they are not “blatantly contradicted”
• collecting cases from Second, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).