New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 11/5/2003
Winslow v. Corporate Express, Inc.
Citations
- 834 A.2d 1037
- 364 N.J. Super. 128
- 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 137
- 2003 N.J. Super. LEXIS 331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “there [was] no basis . . . for [the] plaintiff to pursue a quasi-contractual claim for unjust enrichment” where he had a contract with the defendant
- concluding under the Wage Payment Law, N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.7, a private right of action existed for an employee whose commission rate was reduced without prior notice
- noting that because the “plaintiff’s office was located in Delaware, there may be a question whether [NJWPL] governed his employment” but declining to decide the issue because it had not been briefed
- \One form of conduct which may manifest the parties' intent is a course of dealing that establishes 'a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.'\ (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 223(1) (1981))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Skillman, Wells and Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-01-14· cited 124×
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.D. New Jersey· 2009-11-30· cited 100×
- Vengurlekar v. Silverline Technologies, Ltd.S.D. New York· 2003-11-24· cited 39×
- Minoia v. KushnerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-01-06· cited 29×
- Snyder v. Dietz & Watson, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2011-12-22· cited 22×
- In re Gen. Motors LLCS.D. Illinois· 2018-09-12· cited 16×
- Weske v. Samsung Electronics, America, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2014-08-27· cited 9×
- Doynow Sales Associates, Inc. v. Rocheux International of New Jersey, Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-08-24· cited 2×
- ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, ETC. VS. CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC (L-2044-17, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2021-06-15
- Amgro, Inc. v. Lincoln General InsuranceThird Circuit· 2010-01-20
- Erick Zanetich v. WalMart Stores East IncThird Circuit· 2024-12-09
- Darlene Sanders v. the Levari Group, LLC, Etc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2026-05-26
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-04-15· cited 463×
- Peper v. Princeton University Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-07-05· cited 365×
- Kearny PBA Local 21 v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-07-31· cited 191×
- Kernan v. One Washington Park Urban Renewal AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-06-12· cited 168×
- Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1956-04-23· cited 136×
- Lally v. CopygraphicsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-04-27· cited 125×
- Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-02-16· cited 124×
- Troy v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-06-20· cited 68×
- Lally v. CopygraphicsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-03-13· cited 67×
- Economic Dev. v. Pavonia ResturantNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-12-04· cited 42×
- Nolan v. Control Data Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-08-22· cited 40×
- Caputo v. Nice-Pak Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-04-22· cited 38×
- Teilhaber v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-04-23· cited 31×
- Mulford v. Computer Leasing, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-04-01· cited 20×
- Blecker v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-07-12· cited 19×
- Peper v. Princeton University Bd. of TrusteesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-05-04· cited 10×
- Mita v. CHUBB COMPUTER SERVICESNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-03-02· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.