Skip to main content

Winslow v. Corporate Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 834 A.2d 1037
  • 364 N.J. Super. 128
  • 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 137
  • 2003 N.J. Super. LEXIS 331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “there [was] no basis . . . for [the] plaintiff to pursue a quasi-contractual claim for unjust enrichment” where he had a contract with the defendant
  • concluding under the Wage Payment Law, N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.7, a private right of action existed for an employee whose commission rate was reduced without prior notice
  • noting that because the “plaintiff’s office was located in Delaware, there may be a question whether [NJWPL] governed his employment” but declining to decide the issue because it had not been briefed
  • \One form of conduct which may manifest the parties' intent is a course of dealing that establishes 'a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.'\ (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 223(1) (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Skillman, Wells and Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.