Winslow v. Corporate Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there [was] no basis . . . for [the] plaintiff to pursue a quasi-contractual claim for unjust enrichment” where he had a contract with the defendant
• concluding under the Wage Payment Law, N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.7, a private right of action existed for an employee whose commission rate was reduced without prior notice
• noting that because the “plaintiff’s office was located in Delaware, there may be a question whether [NJWPL] governed his employment” but declining to decide the issue because it had not been briefed
• \One form of conduct which may manifest the parties' intent is a course of dealing that establishes 'a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.'\ (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 223(1) (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).