Winsley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding broad-form submission did not allow appellate review; thereby violating due process
• rev’d on other grounds, 113 S.W.3d 340, 342–43 (Tex. 2003)
• see dissenting opinion section entitled “Broad Form Submission”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).