Skip to main content
· 2/21/1978

Winpisinger v. AURORA CORP. OF ILL., ETC.

Citations

  • 456 F. Supp. 559
  • 1 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2201
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requirement that fiduciary discharge his duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries prohibits fiduciary from granting preference as between plan’s participants or as between plan’s beneficiaries
  • retroactive cancellation of past benefits of selected participants is inconsistent with fiduciary duties
  • “Thus it becomes clear that as a condition of accepting [the employees] into the Fund, ... the Trustees ... could have set higher contribution rates ... if deemed necessary to protect the actuarial soundness of the Fund.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William K. Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.