· 2/21/1978
Winpisinger v. AURORA CORP. OF ILL., ETC.
Citations
- 456 F. Supp. 559
- 1 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2201
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requirement that fiduciary discharge his duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries prohibits fiduciary from granting preference as between plan’s participants or as between plan’s beneficiaries
- retroactive cancellation of past benefits of selected participants is inconsistent with fiduciary duties
- “Thus it becomes clear that as a condition of accepting [the employees] into the Fund, ... the Trustees ... could have set higher contribution rates ... if deemed necessary to protect the actuarial soundness of the Fund.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William K. Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.