Winning v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that coverage issues are for the court but “separating loss due to a covered event” from a “property’s preexisting condition” is “one for the appraiser”
• holding that an “appraiser get[s] to determine what caused” a loss where an insurance policy “allows disagreements over ‘amount of loss’ to go to an appraiser.”
• holding that an “appraiser get[s] to determine what caused” a loss where an insurance policy “allows disagreements over ‘amount of loss’ to go to an appraiser.”
• “If the question here - 10 - were solely about whether hail is a covered peril . . . , then th[is] would be [a] ‘legal question[] for the court.’ ” (quoting Quade, 814 N.W.2d at 707)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).