Skip to main content
· 12/15/1992

Winning Moves, Inc. v. Hi! Baby, Inc.

Citations

  • 605 N.E.2d 1026
  • 238 Ill. App. 3d 834
  • 179 Ill. Dec. 12
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 2031
  • 1992 WL 368050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the trial court was in the best position to determine whether discrepancies in the process server’s affidavits describing the person served and the defendant’s appearance in court adequately corroborated the - 11 - defendant’s claim regarding her lack of service
  • reviewing sufficiency of the evidence after reversal of an indirect criminal contempt proceeding
  • reviewing sufficiency of the evidence after reversal of an indirect criminal contempt proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geiger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.