Skip to main content
· 5/27/2015

Winnier v. Winnier

Citations

  • 163 So. 3d 1279
  • 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7957
  • 2015 WL 3395766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The trial court imputed to the former husband income of $1400 per month based on his CPA’s testimony that this would be a reasonable return on investment of the former husband’s retirement accounts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larose, Silberman, Crenshaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.