Winnett v. City of Portland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that federal Title VII law can be “instructive” in construing Oregon employment discrimination law
• noting that former ORS 659.030, renumbered as ORS 659A.030 (2001
• error in instruction that benefits party challenging it is not reversible error
• “ ‘A person, for example, who has obtained a graduate degree in chemistry, and is then turned down for a chemist’s job because of an impairment, is not likely to be heartened by the news that he can still be a streetcar conductor, an attorney or a forest ranger.’ ”
• applying \substantial factor\ test to ORS 639.030(1)(b)
• applying“substantial factor” test to ORS 639.030(l)(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).