Winnetka Bank v. Mandas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nonmoving party must submit affidavits or rely on depositions or other admissions of record which counter the facts; it has a duty to present a factual basis which would arguably entitled it to judgment in its favor based on the law
• nonmoving party must submit affidavits or rely on depositions or other admissions of record which counter the facts; it has a duty to present a factual basis which would arguably entitled it to judgment in its favor based on the law
• “Appellate court decisions, following Fooden, have adopted the directed verdict standard as the proper test for courts to use in resolving summary judgment motions”
• the plaintiff has a duty to present a factual basis which would arguably entitle her to judgment in her favor based on the law
• the nonmoving party has a duty to present a factual basis which would arguably entitle him to judgment in his favor based on the law
• she has a duty to present a factual basis which would arguably entitle her to judgment in her favor based on the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).