Winnerford Frank H. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the State must prove the required mens rea to commit sexual assault beyond a reasonable doubt as it is a general intent crime
• explaining that sexual assault is a general intent crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bargas v. Burns
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-06-14· cited 81×
• Honeycutt v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2002-10-31· cited 6×
• Scott E. v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 4×
• Machado (Jose) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-03-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• McNair v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1992-01-24· cited 275×
• Manning v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1983-02-14· cited 24×
• Winnerford v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-04-30· cited 11×
• Poole v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-03-30· cited 6×