Skip to main content

Winne v. Lahart

Citations

  • 155 Minn. 307
  • 193 N.W. 587
  • 34 A.L.R. 844
  • 1923 Minn. LEXIS 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing “the doctrine that the note and the mortgage are separate and distinct instruments”
  • stating that the doctrine of construing instruments executed at the same time and for one purpose as one instrument does not mean that where a note and mortgage are executed contemporaneously, a provision in the mortgage is thereby incorporated into and becomes part of the note

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lees

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.