Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/27/1923
Winne v. Lahart
Citations
- 155 Minn. 307
- 193 N.W. 587
- 34 A.L.R. 844
- 1923 Minn. LEXIS 761
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing “the doctrine that the note and the mortgage are separate and distinct instruments”
- stating that the doctrine of construing instruments executed at the same time and for one purpose as one instrument does not mean that where a note and mortgage are executed contemporaneously, a provision in the mortgage is thereby incorporated into and becomes part of the note
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lees
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Conerty v. RichtsteigIllinois Supreme Court· 1942-03-16· cited 26×
- Business Bank v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-07-30· cited 20×
- Roemhildt v. Kristall Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-05-03· cited 17×
- Johnson v. KingNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-10-20· cited 12×
- City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-05-31· cited 10×
- Norwest Bank Hastings National Ass'n v. FranzmeierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-09-11· cited 7×
- Duffy v. StrattonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1926-11-12· cited 7×
- Phillips v. Union Central Life Ins.Eighth Circuit· 1937-02-15· cited 6×
- Wade v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-02-15· cited 6×
- Finley v. FriedmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1960-04-14· cited 5×
- Johnson v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nD. Minnesota· 2009-09-30· cited 5×
- Jordan v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-06-13· cited 4×
- American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-10-13· cited 3×
- Poultrymen's Service Corp. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1962-11-08· cited 3×
- Bank of New York Mellon v. KeiranCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-04-06· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-04-06
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bardwell v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-07-17· cited 40×
- Niggeler v. MaurinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1885-08-14· cited 37×
- White v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1893-01-25· cited 35×
- Keller v. Sioux City & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1880-09-13· cited 28×
- Sprague v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1882-06-16· cited 23×
- Fowler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1880-01-03· cited 22×
- Troska v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1918-05-24· cited 12×
- Thompson v. DaleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1894-07-23· cited 10×
- Bean v. HeronSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-06-08· cited 10×
- Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-06-27· cited 7×
- Macomb Sewer-Pipe Co. v. HanleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-06-11· cited 7×
- Burnside v. CraigSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1918-06-28· cited 6×
- Dodge v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1864-07-15· cited 5×
- Hage v. Drake Marble & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1920-02-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.