Winne v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that certain variable annuities are \covered securities\ and interpreting the phrase \in connection with\
• finding that certain variable annuities are “covered securities” and interpreting the phrase “in connection with”
• dismissing unjust enrichment claim as being “another way of alleging misrepresentation or fraud” and barred by SLUSA
• “in connection with” requirement met because allegedly fraudulent fee charged by brokerage firm was intrinsic component of the security and affected its underlying value
• “in connection with” requirement met because allegedly fraudulent fee charged by brokerage firm was intrinsic component of the security and affected its underlying value
• “in connection with” requirement met because allegedly fraudulent fee charged by brokerage firm was intrinsic component of the security and affected its underlying value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).