Winn v. Griffin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that expert testimony must be sufficiently reliable to be admissible
• recognizing that expert testimony must be sufficiently reliable to be admissible
• acknowledging “science abundantly demonstrates the many vagaries of memory encoding, storage, and retrieval; the malleability of memory; [and] the contaminating effects of extrinsic information” (quoting State v. Henderson, 27 A.3d 872, 916 (N.J. 2011))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).