Skip to main content
· 6/18/2019

Winn v. Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 442 P.3d 1081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that caselaw interpreting the federal Due Process Clause is not binding when interpreting Michigan’s Due Process Clause
  • noting that caselaw interpreting the federal Due Process Clause is not binding when interpreting Michigan’s Due Process Clause
  • noting that caselaw interpreting the federal Due Process Clause is not binding when interpreting Michigan’s Due Process Clause
  • remanding to the Court of Appeals to consider additional issues after a partial reversal
  • “In the instant case, plaintiffs were deprived of their property when . . . their wages [were] garnished.”
  • The Due Process Clause “is violated only if there has been a deprivation of life, liberty, or property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.