Winn-Senter Const. Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contractors' claim was not barred by a release when the contractors had submitted a written claim before executing the release and the government entertained the resubmitted claim after the execution of the release
• holding that an executed release did not bar a claim, where the Government continued to consider a claim thereafter and the conduct of both parties evidenced that they did 3 not construe the release as abandoning the claim
• “These being suits for breach of contract, the plaintiffs had the burden not only of proving that there were breaches, but that they were harmed by the breaches, and the extent of the harm, within measurable limits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).