Skip to main content
· 4/2/1894

Winkleblake v. Dyke

Citations

  • 161 Pa. 5
  • 28 A. 937
  • 1894 Pa. LEXIS 620

Syllabus

<p>Practice — Pleading—Statement—Act of May 25, 1887.</p> <p>Under the act of May 25, 1887, P. L. 271, a statement should contain all the ingredients of a complete cause of action averred in clear, express, and unequivocal language, so that if the defendant is unable to controvert or deny one or more of the material averments of claim, a judgment in default of an affidavit or sufficient affidavit of defence may be entered and liquidated.</p> <p>Where suit is brought to recover damages for particular breaches of a parol contract involving a number of stipulations, there must be an averment, not only as to the aggregate loss, but specific statements of the dam age sustained in the several distinct particulars</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “effective 6 Under Rule 1006(d)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dean, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.