Winkel v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding same claim where plaintiff presented “essentially the same complaints that were litigated in Winkel I, modified only slightly to include unsupported allegations”
• in eminent domain proceeding, district court must find that condemnor has the power of eminent domain and that the taking is necessary to condemnor’s lawful corporate purposes
• res judicata prohibits relitigation of issue between parties which might have been brought in first suit
• \The doctrine of res judicata (or claim preclusion) prohibits a party from asserting in a second lawsuit any matter that might have been asserted in the first lawsuit.\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).