Skip to main content
· 8/26/1976

Winifred Burrage v. Lenon Harrell

Citations

  • 537 F.2d 837
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that argument related to the reasonableness of the defendants actions under emergency conditions was not an impermissible “Golden Rule” argument
  • golden rule argument not improper when related only to reasonableness of party’s actions under exigent conditions and not directed to question of damages
  • \golden rule\ cases \deal with arguments in which the jury is exhorted to place itself in a party's shoes with respect to damages\
  • “golden rule” cases “deal with arguments in which the jury is exhorted to place itself in a party’s shoes with respect to damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Gewin, Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.