Wingfield v. Hackney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that video footage of controlled buys between the defendant and a CI, for which the defendant was charged, constituted a “key piece of evidence” for the State’s case and therefore, disclosure of the video would be relevant and helpful to the defendant’s defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).