Skip to main content
· 4/5/1889

Winget v. Quincy Building & Homestead Ass'n

Citations

  • 128 Ill. 67
  • 21 N.E. 12

Syllabus

<p>1. Building associations—act of 1879—constitutionality—special law regulating interest. The 10th section of the Building Association act of 1872 is not in conflict with the provisions of section 22 of article 4 of the constitution, which prohibits the General Assembly from passing any local or special laws regulating interest on money.</p> <p>2. Same—regulations in respect to loans—validity. Buies of a building association organized under the act of 1872, that no loans shall be made except to members; that loans shall be put up at auction, and struck off to the members bidding the highest premium; that every share of stock shall be subject to a lien for the payment of unpaid installments and other charges incurred thereon; and that no stockholder shall withdraw from the association whose stock is held in pledge for security, are authorized by the statute, and are therefore legal and valid.</p> <p>3. So a by-law providing that when the shares of stock of any series upon which a loan should be granted should reach the matured value of $100 each, the value of the stock should be credited to the account of the borrowing member, is valid, and warranted by the act. By this mode the loan is satisfied and discharged, and the stock so credited is cancelled, and reverts to the association.</p> <p>á. Same—fraud—representations to induce member to take a loan. A building association, by its circulars, set out the advantages of its financial scheme to men of small income. The representations were mostly laudatory, and in many respects the expression of opinion, but none of them, as to any material fact, were shown to be untrue. The party seeking to rescind his contractual relation with the association, on the ground that he was misled, and thereby defrauded, by becoming a member, had a copy of the charter and by-laws of the association, in which the rights and obligations of members, etc., were fully stated. His failure to realize the contemplated benefits represented was owi

Judges: Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.