Skip to main content
· 5/2/1988

Wines v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 704 F. Supp. 754
  • 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2512
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15380
  • 1988 WL 145531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that even pro se complaints are required to allege facts which, if true, state a claim for relief as a matter of law
  • finding that defendant judges were entitled to absolute judicial immunity despite allegations that they failed to give plaintiff adequate notice of a hearing to terminate his parental rights and did not advise him of his right to counsel
  • even pro se complaints are required to allege facts which, if true, state a claim for relief as a matter of law
  • pro se complaints are required to allege facts which, if true, state a claim for relief as a matter of law
  • pro se complaints are required to allege facts which, if true, state a claim for relief as a matter of law
  • even pro se complaints are required to allege facts which, if true, state a claim for relief as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.