· 10/7/2013
Wineman v. City of Santa Maria
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 98
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 254
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3189
- 571 U.S. 940
- 2013 WL 2148035
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that either the veteran must assert that a schedular rating is inadequate or the evidence must present exceptional or unusual circumstances
- holding that either the veteran must assert that a schedular rating is inadequate or the evidence must present exceptional or unusual circumstances
- holding that either the Veteran must assert that a schedular rating is inadequate or the evidence must present exceptional or unusual circumstances
- holding that either the veteran must assert that a schedular rating is inadequate or the evidence must present exceptional or unusual circumstances
- holding that either the veteran must assert that a schedular rating is inadequate or the evidence must present exceptional or unusual circumstances
- holding that either the veteran must assert that a schedular rating is inadequate or the evidence must present exceptional or unusual circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.