Wineberg v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no excusable neglect because the defendants “were properly 18 served with the Complaint, the notice of entry of default, as well as the papers in support of the instant 19 motion”
• defendants’ failure to respond to complaint could not “be 15 attributable to excusable neglect” because “[a]ll were properly served with the Complaint, 16 the notice of entry of default, as well as the papers in support of the instant motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).