Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between inducing third party not to perform contract with plaintiff and hindering plaintiff from performing contract with third party
• discussing the differences between sections 766 and 766A, and noting that Pennsylvania has not specifically adopted 766A
• describing the “privilege” element of the cause of action as requiring that the plaintiff show “the impropriety of the interference”
• district court's conclusion that plaintiff could have done more to mitigate damages without incurring undue risk and expense were \not clearly erroneous\
• “In determining whether an actor’s conduct is ‘proper,’ Pennsylvania courts are guided by the following factors derived from the Restatement (Second
• applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 767 (1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).