Skip to main content
· 3/25/1996

Windle v. United States

Citations

  • 517 U.S. 1115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of breach of contract and tortious interference with contract claims under Rule 12(b)(6) because the complaint did not indicate that plaintiff had a contract with defendant
  • affirming dismissal of breach of contract and tortious interference with contract claims under Rule 12(b)(6) because the complaint did not indicate that plaintiff had a contract with defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.