· 6/17/2003
WINDHAM AT CARMEL MTN. RANCH ASSOCIATION v. Superior Court
Citations
- 135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 834
- 109 Cal. App. 4th 1162
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5194
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 6603
- 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 899
- 2003 D.A.R. 6603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Exceptions to the privity requirement have been established in cases involving foodstuffs, drugs and pesticides.”
- “Privity of 8 contract is a relationship that is a prerequisite for maintaining certain causes of action[.]”
- “Privity is generally a requirement for implied warranty claims under California 4 law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDONALD
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.