Skip to main content
· 9/29/2014

Winder v. Maynard

Citations

  • 583 F. App'x 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing cases in support of, but also some inconsistent with, this proposition
  • discussing cases in support of, but also some inconsistent with, this proposition
  • “[A]ecording to the allegations in the [complaint], Defendant’s direct action led to the creation of a copy of the [infringing] video on YouTube’s servers in California, and to the subsequent viewing of the video by potentially thousands in the United States.”
  • “There is currently no clear consensus among the courts regarding whether the issue of the extraterritorial reach of the Copyright Act should be treated as a matter of subject matter jurisdiction, or should instead be treated as an element of a claim.”
  • analyzing extraterritorial application of Copyright Act under Rule 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agee, Davis, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.