· 9/29/2014
Winder v. Maynard
Citations
- 583 F. App'x 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing cases in support of, but also some inconsistent with, this proposition
- discussing cases in support of, but also some inconsistent with, this proposition
- “[A]ecording to the allegations in the [complaint], Defendant’s direct action led to the creation of a copy of the [infringing] video on YouTube’s servers in California, and to the subsequent viewing of the video by potentially thousands in the United States.”
- “There is currently no clear consensus among the courts regarding whether the issue of the extraterritorial reach of the Copyright Act should be treated as a matter of subject matter jurisdiction, or should instead be treated as an element of a claim.”
- analyzing extraterritorial application of Copyright Act under Rule 12(b)(6
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agee, Davis, Wilkinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.