Wind River Multiple-Use Advocates v. Espy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts that have considered this issue, have held that the MUSYA grants the Forest Service ‘wide discretion to weigh and decide the proper uses within any area.’” (quoting Big Hole Ranchers Ass’n v. U.S. Forest Serv., 686 F.Supp. 256, 264 (D. Mont. 1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).