Winchester v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[b]y its terms, § 1692f(1) prohibits the collection of any amount which is not expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law,” and holding that a § 1692f(1
• granting the plaintiffs’ summary judgment on their Section 1692e claim where the collection letter stated, “[t]here will be a $5.00 processing fee for all credit cards”
• “Collection of this [processing] fee fits within the scope of conduct described in [Section] 1692f(1) [of FDCPA] and, by operation of that provision, would be deemed a violation of [Section] 1692f.”
• “There will 20 be a $5.00 processing fee for all credit cards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).