Skip to main content
· 5/1/1950

Winborne v. Doyle

Citations

  • 190 Va. 867
  • 59 S.E.2d 90
  • 1950 Va. LEXIS 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the failure to seek consequential or incidental relief in a declaratory judgment action does not bar other proceedings to enforce the rights determined by the judgment, whether by petition filed in the declaratory judgment action, or in a separate and independent action
  • interpreting provision similar to NRS 30.100 to allow for further relief whether \by petition filed in [the declaratory relief action] or in a separate and independent action\
  • interpreting provision similar to NRS 30.100 to allow for further relief whether \by petition filed in [the declaratory relief action] or in a separate and independent action\
  • “The general rule is that in a declaratory judgment proceeding coercive relief is not sought. However, coercive relief may be demanded — that is, the rights of the parties may not only be determined, but they may be enforced, in the one action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudgins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.