Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \This court has interpreted the workers' compensation statute to prohibit suits against an employer for both intentional and non- intentional torts.\
• RSA 281:12, precursor to RSA 281-A:8, \clearly prohibits an employee from maintaining a common-law action against his employer for personal injuries arising out of the employment relationship.\
• “If the ‘administrative gloss’ placed upon the clause over a period of years is to be changed, the voters of [the town], not the zoning board, must change it.”
• “To succeed in an action for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove that he was subjected to a criminal prosecution instituted by the defendant without probable cause and with malice, and that the criminal 12 proceeding terminated in his favor.”
• interpreting New Hampshire's workers' compensation l a w

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).