Wimer v. Hinkle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “ordinarily[,] a party may not claim evidentiary error on appeal where no objection is made at the trial level”
• explaining that the raise or waive rule is designed “to prevent a party from obtaining an unfair advantage by failing to give the trial (continued . . .
• explaining that the raise or waive rule is designed “to prevent a party from obtaining an unfair advantage by failing to give the trial court an opportunity to rule on the 3 objection and thereby correct potential error.”
• ”[A]n objection to an adverse ruling on a motion in limine ... will preserve the point.”
• “The fundamental purpose of an objection to evidence is to bring to the court’s attention potentially inadmissible evidence so that the court may make a ruling on the question.”
• The raise or waive rule is designed “to prevent a party from obtaining an unfair advantage by failing to give the trial court an opportunity to rule on the objection and thereby correct potential error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).