Wimberly v. Wittmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[w]e have consistently held that it is the duty of a reviewing court to search the record before it for evidence supporting the decision of a local zoning board.\ (Citations omitted.)
• addressing issue that should have been raised by cross appeal because issue had been fully briefed and it appeared parties would not be prejudiced
• exercising discretion to address claim that should have been raised by way of cross appeal ‘‘[b]ecause the issue has been fully briefed and it appears that the parties will not be prejudiced’’
• “local land use commission [is] composed of laypersons whose procedural savoir-faire may not rise to the sophisticated level needed to achieve strict compliance with the statutory directions under which they operate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).