Wimberly v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing, as an elementary proposition, that “[i]t is essential, of course, to the enactment of a bill into a law that both the House and the Senate shall concur in and pass the same bill”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nevada Mining Ass'n v. Erdoes
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2001-07-17· cited 11×
• Devvy Kidd v. Carlos Cascos, Texas Secretary of State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-06-29

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boyd v. Roane
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1887-05-15· cited 46×
• Emerson v. Boyles
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1926-03-01· cited 37×
• Ingram v. Raiford
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1927-10-17· cited 10×
• King v. Clay
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1879-11-15· cited 5×
• Williams v. Bogard
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1922-02-06· cited 1×