Skip to main content
· 2/19/2004

Wilson & Wilson Tax Services Inc. v. Mohammed

Citations

  • 131 S.W.3d 231
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 1576
  • 2004 WL 307334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that promissory note itself constituted evidence that consideration was given wherein it stated that it was entered “For Value Received”
  • holding that the trial court erred by granting a directed verdict since there was a fact issue concerning the validity of a promissory note
  • holding that promissory note itself constituted evidence that consideration was given wherein it stated that it was entered “For Value Received”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Edelman, Seymore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.