· 1/13/1999
Wilson v. Woods
Citations
- 163 F.3d 935
- 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 177
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 379
- 1999 WL 306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- questioning whether a field can be classified as an expert field “under the rules and guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in Daubert.”
- in deciding whether to admit expert testimony, the district court considers whether the witness is qualified in an appropriate field
- recognized expert on causes of fires excluded as expert on motor vehicle collision accident reconstruction
- “A district court should refuse to allow an expert to testify if it finds that the witness is not qualified to testify in a particular field or a given subject.”
- “A district court should refuse to allow an expert to testify if it finds that the witness is not qualified to testify in a particular field or a given subject.”
- “A district court should refuse to allow an expert to testify if it finds that the witness is not qualified to testify in a particular field or a given subject.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Jones, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.