Skip to main content
· 1/13/1999

Wilson v. Woods

Citations

  • 163 F.3d 935
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 177
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 379
  • 1999 WL 306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • questioning whether a field can be classified as an expert field “under the rules and guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in Daubert.”
  • in deciding whether to admit expert testimony, the district court considers whether the witness is qualified in an appropriate field
  • recognized expert on causes of fires excluded as expert on motor vehicle collision accident reconstruction
  • “A district court should refuse to allow an expert to testify if it finds that the witness is not qualified to testify in a particular field or a given subject.”
  • “A district court should refuse to allow an expert to testify if it finds that the witness is not qualified to testify in a particular field or a given subject.”
  • “A district court should refuse to allow an expert to testify if it finds that the witness is not qualified to testify in a particular field or a given subject.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Jones, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.