Wilson v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing equitable distribution order is interlocutory and unappealable until rendered final by entry of divorce decree
• “It is well settled that a pre-divorce decree distributing marital property is an interlocutory order.”
• “[A] pre-divorce decree distributing marital property is interlocutory. It cannot be reviewed until it has been rendered final by the entry of a decree in divorce.”
• pre-divorce order distributing marital property is interlocutory and unappealable; appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review equitable distribution order until order is rendered final by entry of divorce decree
• “a pre-divorce decree distributing marital property is interlocutory. . . . It cannot be reviewed until it has been rendered final by the entry of a decree in divorce”
• “a pre-divorce decree distributing marital property is interlocutory. . . . It cannot be reviewed until it has been rendered final by the entry of a decree in divorce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'n
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-15· cited 110×
• Radakovich v. Radakovich
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-25· cited 29×
• Sneeringer v. Sneeringer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-03· cited 12×
• Jagnow, C. v. Jagnow, S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-06-29· cited 6×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Campbell v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-06· cited 69×
• In re N.B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-07· cited 38×
• Reese v. Reese
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-21· cited 28×