District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/21/2010
Wilson v. Wilson
Citations
- 37 So. 3d 877
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5248
- 2010 WL 1563663
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a thirty-five percent decrease in income considered a substantial change in circumstances for purposes of modification of alimony
- noting that, if a voluntary retirement is reasonable, it is a change in circumstances that may be considered, along with other factors, when determining whether alimony should be modified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larose, Wallace, Crenshaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jarrard v. JarrardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-07· cited 20×
- Driggers v. DriggersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-27· cited 6×
- Suarez v. SanchezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-18· cited 4×
- Dogoda v. DogodaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-06
- PEDRO SUAREZ v. CANDICE MURPHY SUAREZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-11-13
- JOHN-CHARLES ALLAIRE v. BARBARA SILVA ALLAIREDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-09-15
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Pimm v. PimmSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 121×
- Scott v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-11-02· cited 29×
- Nichols v. NicholsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 22×
- Ward v. WardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-27· cited 21×
- Rahn v. RahnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 20×
- Kinne v. KinneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-01· cited 20×
- Leonard v. LeonardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-07· cited 18×
- DeSantis v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-06· cited 15×
- Thomas v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-21· cited 13×
- McConnell v. McConnellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-31· cited 11×
- Eisemann v. EisemannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-06· cited 11×
- Antepenko v. AntepenkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-17· cited 11×
- Pimm v. PimmDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-12· cited 10×
- Vazquez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-01· cited 10×
- Thyrre v. ThyrreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-10· cited 10×
- Servies v. ServiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 9×
- Laliberte v. LaliberteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-22· cited 8×
- Chambliss v. ChamblissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-03· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.